VPNs are becoming necessary for ensuring online anonymity and enhancing online security. As a result, the VPN industry is saturated with many providers claiming they offer the best features.
PureVPN and Astrill VPN are excellent VPN services that have good reputations. Both VPNs have gathered positive and negative reviews from many online users. They recently entered the VPN market’s limelight due to their similar features.
These VPNs have site-unblocking abilities, zero-logging policies, dedicated tunneling protocols, and advanced security features. In addition, they work excellently in repressive regions and prevent IP leaks.
Although PureVPN and Astrill VPN are great services, they differ, particularly in the performance category.
We share this detailed head-to-head comparison of PureVPN vs. Astrill VPN to make selecting between these VPNs easier. This article will consider features, speed, security, infrastructure, interface availability and usability, server network, and customer support to pick a winner.
PureVPN vs. Astrill VPN: Quick table summary
This table summarises key facts about each VPN service:
|Pricing||From $10.95 per month||From $30.00 per month|
|Supported devices||Windows, Linux, Android, Xbox, macOS, iOS, routers,||Linux, Android, iOS, macOS, Windows, routers|
|Security||AES 256-bit encryption, Automatic Kill Switch, NAT Firewall, Dedicated IP, Port forwarding, DDoS protection||AES 256-bit encryption, Kill Switch, VIP Add-on, DNS leak protection|
|Privacy||Strict zero-logs policy, based in the British Virgin Islands, proven by independent audit,||No logs policy, based in Seychelles|
|VPN protocols||OpenVPN, PPTP, L2TP/IPSec, IKEv2 and SSTP||OpenWeb, WireGuard, OpenConnect IPSec, StealthVPN/RouterPRO, Cisco IPSec, OpenVPN, PPTP, L2TP/IPSec, IKEv2 and SSTP|
|Customer support||24/7 live chat, email/ticket support, and helpdesk knowledge base||Satisfactory customer service, extensive FAQ section, email support, live chat, and setup tutorials|
PureVPN and Astrill VPN are among the best VPNs in the world. These providers have excellent security, privacy, and torrenting features that make them seem almost identical. PureVPN has a sizable 6,500 servers across 88 locations and 70+ countries. But, Astrill VPN has a small network of 3,000 servers in 112 cities across 57 countries, making it inferior to PureVPN.
PureVPN is based in the British Virgin Islands, while Astrill VPN is headquartered in Seychelles. Despite PureVPN’s previous location in Hong Kong, it seemingly never supported services in China; yet it works relatively well in other repressive regions. In contrast, Astrill VPN works better in China and other countries with restrictive laws.
Both providers are excellent for unblocking streaming sites like Netflix. Besides, they both utilize 256-bit encryption and a kill switch.
Then some features differ. Firstly, PureVPN has a dedicated IP and DNS leak protection, which are missing in Astrill VPN. If you’re looking for a VPN with torrenting servers, Astrill VPN is your best option, as this feature is lacking in PureVPN.
Neither VPNs have a SmartDNS feature. This means you’ll be unable to protect devices that don’t usually work with VPNs, like Kodi and PlayStation. PureVPN has multiple tunneling protocol choices like OpenVPN, PPTP, L2TP, IPSec, IKEv2, and SSTP. Astrill has them, too, with more options like OpenWeb, WireGuard, OpenConnect IPSec, StealthVPN/RouterPRO, and Cisco IPSec.
PureVPN vs. Astrill VPN: Which one has better speed?
PureVPN and Astrill VPN have good speeds compared to other VPN services. Although they’re not incredibly fast like Surfshark and ExpressVPN, these providers hardly experience lags or buffering during streaming. Besides, PureVPN and Astrill VPN take less than three minutes when downloading files.
Since VPNs encrypt your data and redirect your traffic, they will likely slow down your connection. So, you must choose a service that will increase your internet speed.
To check how fast these VPNs were for streaming, content uploads, and torrenting, we tested them in various locations to give you an average rate, using symmetric internet service with 300 Mbps as the baseline speed.
During Astrill VPN tests, OpenVPN had frequent disconnections. The average download speed dipped by 22 percent off the baseline, with servers in Argentina and India being the low points. Likewise, the upload rates dropped by 32 percent. Using the OpenWeb protocol reduced our upload speed by 46 percent and download by 4 percent.
On WireGuard, which has a reputation for being a fast tunneling protocol, the average download speed was reduced by 30 percent, while uploads were reduced by 70 percent.